#Lightroom cr2 file canon 6d mark ii software
#Lightroom cr2 file canon 6d mark ii professional

Here is a link to my side by side test, a crop at 100%. Maybe my 6D isn't as noisy as I thought, it has a lot to do with the post processing. So I think I may be changing how I import my photos into LR, at least for important shots by running them through DPP4 first then export to TIFF and into LR5. The DPP4 TIFF from the exact same CR2 file imported into LR5 with no further adjustments looked much better with more detail and no noise. I moved it up to 49, to the point I started noticing detail starting to be lost and I could still see some noise, OK, pixel peeping, but noise is there and visible at 100%. Next I assumed I would just need to tweak the Lightroom Luminance noise a little. When the RAW photo was viewed in Lightroom 5, I was surprised at how much more noise was visible, so I went back to DPP4 to look at the same shot with default adjustments, there was a noticeable difference, I exported the photo as a TIFF from DPP4 and imported that TIFF into Lightroom 5 to compare side by side. I imported the shots into Lightroom 5 and went to one particular shot that I had been looking at in DPP.

I have not used DPP much in a couple of years, but it opens as the default. Of course, the ultimate aim is to get the image right in-camera.I was doing some testing of my 6D tonight tethered to my computer, (PC) using the Canon EOS software. So why use DPP 4? Well the images speak for themselves, and out of preference here at EOS magazine we would rather have the camera and computer doing all the work rather than spending hours correcting substitute settings added by non-Canon RAW converters. Did you have the wrong white balance set when shooting? No problem вЂ“ just change the white balance setting in DPP and it's instantly put right. And, just as usefully, those settings can be undone, or altered as needed. Open the images in DPP and those corrections are done for you. And that takes time, regardless of how proficient you may be.ДЄsk yourself, could that time be better spent elsewhere? Now of course, all these settings and their effect on the image can be replicated in other RAW converter software, but you have to make the corrections manually. A further setting вЂ“ Distortion correction вЂ“ can also be turned on within the camera. The example shown above is Peripheral illumination correction, but on the latest models there are additional corrections applied automatically вЂ“ Chromatic aberration correction and Diffusion correction. In third party software, they are discarded. These corrections are applied automatically to JPEG images but they will only be used on RAW files by CanonвЂ™s DPP software. Your EOS camera will automatically correct for common lens aberrations if you use Canon lenses.

#Lightroom cr2 file canon 6d mark ii professional

The images below were all opened as RAW files in Adobe's Photoshop and Canon's Digital Photo Professional and converted to JPEG, with no corrections done. Here are five key settings and Canon features which will be stripped out or substituted with generic processes by third party RAW converters. So if the вЂrecipeвЂ™ is patented, when it comes to camera algorithms, how can you possibly get the same results with a third-party brand imitating what the original does? after all Coca Cola is patented вЂ“ you cannot make the same recipe вЂ“ and other brands simply do not taste the same. Much of the data saved with the file are algorithms that are patented by Canon.

#Lightroom cr2 file canon 6d mark ii software

However, the software can only apply generic settings. If you use third party software, there is an option to process the RAW file using the camera settings.

These settings are then applied automatically when the RAW conversion is done, but only if using DPP. The camera saves the RAW image file without applying any corrections, but instead saves the settings you have chosen as data within the image file. If you shoot RAW the process is different.